The fine print tells the story. Buried in the Kalshi Member Agreement, the click-to-accept contract every user of the booming, CFTC-regulated prediction market must sign, India sits on a list of more than 50 “Restricted Jurisdictions” whose residents are barred from trading the platform’s event contracts.
India appears alongside the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Singapore, France, China, and a roster of sanctioned states, formalizing in Kalshi’s own terms what Indian regulators have spent the past year demanding: that Indians be shut out of prediction markets.
For one of the world’s fastest-growing financial venues, and for a country with one of the world’s largest appetites for betting on cricket and elections, that exclusion is a significant moment.
What the agreement says
Kalshi, which operates as a CFTC-designated contract market governed by New York law, states that users domiciled, organized, or located in a Restricted Jurisdiction are prohibited from trading event contracts on its platform. The agreement is careful about scope: the restriction applies, in its words, “solely to the trading of Event Contracts,” and does not by itself bar membership, non-trading access, or trading of other products. Kalshi also reserves sole and absolute discretion to grant, deny or condition access to anyone, including residents of restricted markets.
That nuance matters, because it explains an apparent contradiction. Earlier in 2026, reports indicated Kalshi was still accepting Indian sign-ups and had named India a priority in its plan to expand into 140 countries, citing cricket’s digitally native fan base.
The member agreement reconciles the two: Indians may be able to hold an account, but trading the core event-contract product is off the table under Kalshi’s own rules.
India slammed the door first
Kalshi’s restriction follows, rather than leads, India’s crackdown. The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act (PROGA), passed in 2025, and its accompanying rules that took effect on May 1, 2026, imposed a blanket ban on “online money games” and created an Online Gaming Authority of India to police the sector. Regulators swept prediction markets into the prohibited category, branding opinion trading a form of “digital satta,” or digital gambling.
The fallout was swift. Homegrown opinion-trading platforms shut their real-money operations, with some halting deposits and urging users to withdraw funds amid Enforcement Directorate raids under money-laundering law and multiple police cases.
The crypto grey market fills the void
With domestic platforms gone and global ones formally restricted, Indian demand has not disappeared, it has gone around the wall, and the detour runs through crypto. Polymarket, the on-chain prediction market, has not geoblocked India at the platform level, so users restore access via VPNs or DNS changes after Indian ISPs began blocking the site. To fund accounts, Indians buy USDC on local exchanges using UPI or bank transfers, then bridge the stablecoin to Polymarket over the Polygon network.
That workaround is neither cheap nor frictionless. It runs straight into India’s punishing crypto regime, a flat 30% tax on gains with no loss offsets and a 1% TDS on transactions, and into a tightening enforcement net. In April, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology wrote to VPN providers warning that users were reaching “illegal and blocked” prediction-market platforms despite domestic prohibitions, signaling that the grey corridor itself is now a target.
Why it matters
The net effect is a striking regulatory vacuum. A country with enormous, cricket-fueled appetite for prediction markets has been locked out of every regulated venue at once, its domestic apps banned, the largest US exchange restricting it by contract, and the on-chain alternative reachable only through a tax-heavy, VPN-dependent crypto route that regulators are racing to close.
For the crypto sector, it is a familiar Indian pattern: prohibition at home redirecting activity offshore and onto blockchain rails, where stablecoins and DeFi infrastructure become the default plumbing for demand the formal system refuses to serve. Whether India eventually carves out a regulated path for prediction markets, as the industry, citing the CFTC model, keeps urging, or hardens the ban further will determine whether that crypto grey market shrinks or simply entrenches.
Also Read: How an 85-5 Housing Compromise Secretly Smuggled in a Fed CBDC Ban
