The fallout from the UK sanctions against Huobi Global S.A. is now entering its second day, and the situation on the ground has shifted. HTX’s community representative, HTX Molly, posted a series of updates on X confirming that some user funds frozen on rival platforms have now been restored.
But for many others, the restrictions remain in place. The debate across crypto Twitter about who bears responsibility for the collateral damage to ordinary users is growing louder by the hour.
This is an update to The Crypto Times’ earlier coverage published on May 27, which detailed how the UK designated Huobi Global S.A. under its Russia sanctions framework, accusing the entity of helping the Kremlin move funds through crypto channels.
That action triggered Bybit, OKX, and Bitget to issue warnings and tighten compliance checks on HTX-linked addresses, while blockchain analytics firms like Chainalysis, Elliptic, and TRM Labs published data showing billions in on-chain flows between HTX and previously sanctioned Russian entities.
HTX Molly: “This is just a technical mishap”
In herlatest post on X, HTX Molly confirmed that after a full day of work, funds and accounts for some users have now been restored to normal. She thanked what she called “friendly competitors” for their understanding and cooperation.
For users whose funds have not been restored yet, Molly asked for patience, saying the team will continue to help everyone resolve the issues. She also addressed concerns about accounts being flagged on other platforms, saying HTX is already in contact with the relevant platforms to provide feedback on the situation and push for a resolution.
She emphasized repeatedly that the situation amounts to nothing more than a “technical mishap” and that there is nothing wrong with the users themselves. Her accounts have no issues and will all be restored to normal, she wrote.
Her earlierpost from May 27 had laid out HTX’s position in detail, arguing that “same brand doesn’t mean same legal entity” and that the UK sanctions target a specific Panama-registered entity, not the trading platform users interact with daily.
In a separate reply to a community member, Molly addressed user reports that withdrawals from HTX to platforms like Binance and OKX were resulting in frozen funds. She reassured users that HTX’s customer service is always available and that the team “won’t shirk responsibility or run away.”
HTX publishes open letter to all exchanges and industry partners
Separately, HTX published a lengthy open letter addressed to all exchanges and industry partners. The letter, which was also picked up by BlockBeats, described what happened as “unprecedented and deeply unsettling.”
The core argument: after the UK sanctions triggered negative attention, third-party risk control and security systems began conducting “widespread, indiscriminate risk tagging” on all addresses that had any financial interaction with HTX.
Users who had simply made normal deposits, withdrawals, or trades suddenly found themselves facing fund movement restrictions, trading limitations, and in some extreme cases, asset freezes on entirely separate platforms just because they had touched HTX at some point.
The letter stated that HTX itself is operating completely normally. Trading is normal, deposits and withdrawals are normal, OTC is normal. But the “abnormal” part has instead become the users themselves. The letter called this “an utterly absurd phenomenon.”
The open letter made two direct appeals to other exchanges:
First, that platforms jointly provide feedback to third-party security and risk control firms about the mis-tagging, restrictions on fund movements, and account freezes affecting users, and push those institutions to fix the problems.
Second, that exchanges optimize their risk control logic for HTX users who exhibit normal behavior and have clear fund sources, rather than applying blanket restrictions.
The letter ended with a pointed warning: if, in the end, all users can only choose to withdraw funds to the chain or exit via OTC, that won’t be a failure for HTX alone. It will be a failure of the entire CEX industry’s trust system.
HTX also declared that the platform has always actively embraced compliance and is willing to cooperate fully with all relevant parties for reviews and communications to resolve the situation as quickly as possible.
Tonys Tucker: “HTX’s crisis response shows top-10 CEX stature”
Crypto commentator Tonys Tucker posted that the kind of crisis HTX encountered would have been a “catastrophic disaster” for any small or medium-sized exchange, but that HTX’s handling of it demonstrates the stature and emergency response capabilities of a top-10 global crypto CEX.
Tucker pointed out three things. First, all HTX trading platform functions are operating completely normally, with withdrawals, deposits, trading, OTC trading, and more all functioning without restrictions. Second, users’ funds are fully under their own control.
Even though all of HTX’s addresses have been tagged with “risk labels” and several top-tier CEXes have explicitly stated that funds transferred from HTX will be frozen, HTX still respects users’ own wishes in directing their funds and has not restricted users’ withdrawal actions.
Third, Tucker noted that during this period, when users’ funds transferred to partner platforms were frozen, the HTX team has been proactively negotiating and communicating with those platforms on behalf of users to unfreeze the funds where no issues are found. Currently, some users’ funds have already been unfrozen by the partner platforms.
Tucker summarized HTX’s message from this entire affair as: “You can sanction me, but my users are innocent.”
@bydaoTina tells users to “Sit and Wait” but then sounds the alarm on Chainalysis
Community figure @bydaoTina posted a thread that quickly racked up over 11,600 views. She acknowledged that withdrawing assets from HTX to Binance or OKX was currently resulting in funds being frozen, and that a friend’s Binance account had been banned outright.
But she still expressed confidence in HTX, calling it a “veteran exchange” that is “still very trustworthy,” and told users to “just sit and wait” while referencing HTX Molly’s detailed explanation.
In a follow-up post, however, her tone shifted sharply. She asked why ordinary users should bear the brunt of a situation they had no part in creating. She pointed the finger directly at Chainalysis’s risk control technology, saying the root of all these issues this time lies not with HTX at all, but in vulnerabilities in Chainalysis’s risk control system.
She called on all exchanges in the industry to unite and speak out, giving ordinary users a “crypto world free from fear and anxiety.” She argued that it’s not just HTX that’s integrated with Chainalysis’s risk control system. Many familiar industry exchanges use it too. “Your inaction today, will you be indiscriminately flagged tomorrow without distinction?” she wrote.
She closed with a warning: “This time it’s HTX exchange users caught in the indiscriminate crossfire, and we’re standing by. Will it be another exchange tomorrow? Does anyone dare to bet on it?”
FLS OTC names Chainalysis as the “Root Culprit”
OTC trading community account FLS OTC published a detailed thread putting Chainalysis squarely in the crosshairs.
The post described Chainalysis as a leading U.S. blockchain on-chain data analysis and compliance risk control company established in 2014 that is currently the official-level risk control, tracing, and compliance standards service provider for the global crypto industry.
It noted that the system is used by over 90% of mainstream exchanges worldwide, as well as regulatory authorities, police, and tax agencies in various countries, calling it the “irreplaceable, monopoly-level risk control tool in the industry at present.”
But FLS OTC’s core criticism was that even a risk control company like this makes no distinction at all between platform entities and independent user entities. Despite being clearly two separate legal entities, Chainalysis’s algorithms “forcibly link and collaterally damage them.”
The post called the algorithmic mechanisms “extremely crude and one-size-fits-all” and argued that while Chainalysis is inherently a compliance and anti-fraud tool, it is not a regulator, yet it “wields life-and-death power over users across the entire industry.”
FLS OTC called Chainalysis the “root culprit behind the innocent collateral damage to HTX exchange users in this incident and the poisoning of the broader industry.”
The critic: @xiaoheshang2025 Calls It “Petty Scheming”
Not everyone was sympathetic to HTX’s framing. Crypto commentator @xiaoheshang2025 published a sharply critical post accusing Huobi of engaging in “petty scheming behavior.”
The post laid out the timeline: the UK government recently released a sanctions list, and Huobi was included for allegedly laundering money for Russia. Faced with this serious accusation, almost all other major exchanges in the crypto space issued risk control statements right away, explicitly banning users from making deposits or withdrawals related to Huobi and freezing accounts involved in such activities.
The critic called these measures by other exchanges “essentially aimed at protecting their own platform users from potential legal and compliance risks.”
The critic accused Huobi of, instead of reflecting on why it was implicated in money laundering, resorting to the “old trick of shifting the blame,” publicly accusing other exchanges of undermining users’ basic freedom to withdraw and transfer funds, and pinning the resulting account freezes and asset restrictions on the “overreaction” of those platforms.
The post was blunt: the isolation and freezing measures by other exchanges are “precisely to safeguard the legitimate rights of the vast majority of users.” Before the facts are fully investigated, no responsible trading platform would ignore the risk of exposing its users to regulatory blockades and account freezes. That, the critic said, would be a tragedy for the entire industry.
The post argued that Huobi’s top priority should have been “self-reflection, cooperating with investigations, and offering sincere apologies and reasonable compensation to affected users.” Instead, Huobi took what the critic called “the low road: blaming other exchanges, stoking its users’ anxiety to rally them, and subtly attacking peers.”
The critic also took aim at how Huobi is downplaying the whole thing externally as “just a compliance review” while trying to fool its platform users. Meanwhile, the critic noted, the exchange’s actual controller, Sun Yuchen (Justin Sun), “jumped out right away to distance himself, stressing that he’s just an advisor to Huobi, as if users are idiots.”
The Justin Sun question keeps getting louder
Tron founder Justin Sun posted on X on May 27 that he “was first made aware today of the recent developments” and would “continue to monitor the situation closely,” while affirming his belief in full compliance with applicable laws and cooperation with law enforcement agencies worldwide.
But crypto researcher @Web3Danger1 challenged that framing directly. In a post that included a detailed ownership structure diagram, the account pointed out that in 2022, Huobi’s controlling equity was transferred out from the Li Lin system, with the buyer being an acquisition vehicle managed by About Capital. Justin Sun then entered Huobi as a “Global Advisor / Advisory Committee Member.”
The post argued that on the surface, Sun has indeed always been just a consultant for Huobi. But the core buyer and funder behind About Capital all points to Sun. His public role is advisor, the public equity is held by About Capital, but his actual influence is “demonstrated through capital penetration, platform tokens, and ecosystem synergies.”
The implication, according to the researcher: “This way, he can control Huobi while reducing the regulatory, legal, and public opinion costs associated with personal direct shareholding and direct appointments.”
Sun was not personally named in the UK sanctions filing.
A quick recap of what happened
For those catching up: On May 26, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office designated 18 entities and individuals under its Russia sanctions framework. Huobi Global S.A., the Panama-registered entity linked to HTX, was among them, accused of providing financial services to Kremlin-linked entities including the A7 payments network and Garantex.
Blockchain analytics firms published staggering on-chain data.TRM Labs reported that HTX sent more than $4.9 billion in direct on-chain transactions to the sanctioned entities and related high-risk platforms.Elliptic flagged HTX’s roughly $3.3 trillion in 2025 trading volume and noted this was the first time the UK applied Regulation 17A to a cryptoasset exchange.Chainalysis also confirmed the scope of the sanctions.
Bybit, OKX, and Bitget all issued public warnings within hours. Bybit recommended users avoid HTX-related addresses entirely. OKX specifically warned users who had engaged in arbitrage trading between the two platforms. Bitget updated its compliance screening systems and warned that transactions involving sanctioned entities may be subject to rejection or account termination.
In a CoinDesk exclusive, an HTX spokesperson confirmed that the A7A5 ruble stablecoin listing application had been explicitly rejected following internal due diligence. A7A5 executive Oleg Ogienko confirmed the rejection himself.
Where things stand now
As of May 28, HTX’s trading, deposit, withdrawal, and OTC functions continue to operate normally according to the exchange. Some user funds that were frozen on partner platforms have been restored, though many others are still waiting. HTX says it is in active communication with relevant platforms and third-party risk control providers to resolve the remaining issues.
The broader debate has moved beyond HTX itself. Multiple voices across crypto Twitter are now questioning whether the real systemic risk lies not in any single exchange, but in the monopoly-level power that blockchain analytics firms like Chainalysis hold over the entire industry’s risk control infrastructure, and whether their algorithmic flagging mechanisms are too blunt an instrument for the complex realities of how users move funds across platforms.
The Crypto Times will continue to update this story as it develops.
Also Read: Aave and Kelp DAO Restore rsETH Operations After April Exploit
