Solana’s Emergency Patch Sparks Decentralization Debate

Grant Hummer, founder of Ethereum-aligned firm Etherealize criticized the coordination, comparing it to the inner workings of a traditional tech company rather than a decentralized blockchain.

Written By:
Dishita Malvania

Solana’s Emergency Patch Sparks Decentralization Debate

Mid-April, Solana pulled off a quiet emergency upgrade—no headlines, no alerts, just a hush-hush patch for a flaw that could’ve let attackers mint unlimited tokens and empty wallets. The bug never got exploited, but here’s the kicker: the way this was handled, behind closed doors, has left many in the crypto space uneasy.

According to a postmortem released by the Solana Foundation on May 2, the network’s core validators coordinated two quick patches behind the scenes. These were applied on April 17 without any public disclosure beforehand. 

While no funds were stolen, and the exploit was never used, the entire operation was kept under wraps until well after the fact.

This incident has sparked renewed debate around Solana’s decentralization—or, as some critics argue, the lack of it.

Quiet Coordination Raises Eyebrows

The concern isn’t about the fix itself, but how it was implemented. Validators—many of whom run from centralized data centers—worked together in private channels to push the patch. The stealth and speed of this move may have protected the network, but some observers say it’s also a red flag.

Grant Hummer, founder of Ethereum-aligned firm Etherealize, didn’t mince words. He criticized the coordination, comparing it to the inner workings of a traditional tech company rather than a decentralized blockchain.

“If your chain can hard fork overnight with a small group of datacenter validators in a Discord chat room, what else can it do overnight? Steal, freeze or delete your assets, maybe?” Hummer wrote in a tweet from his account, gphummer.eth.

He added, “If president AOC wants to change Solana’s state and sends some angry men in suits to Anatoly’s house, what do you think will happen?”

The comment was a direct reference to the potential vulnerability of Solana Labs co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko to government pressure—something critics argue undermines the idea of censorship resistance.

And this isn’t some one-off incident either. Rewind to August 2023—Solana pulled the same move. Another critical bug, another quiet patch, same playbook. For a network that claims to be decentralized, this pattern is starting to raise eyebrows. 

While some have argued that developers on other chains, like Bitcoin and Ethereum, might act just as quickly in a crisis, Hummer pointed out a key difference: time and coordination. In his view, Ethereum and Bitcoin’s decentralized structures would slow down such a process, making backdoor deals or unilateral changes far harder to execute.

“That’s not a blockchain – that’s a glorified company division,” Hummer concluded.

Critics Point to Solana’s Origins

Hummer and others also highlighted the network’s beginnings as part of the problem. Solana’s 2020 token sale reportedly saw 98.5% of its supply go to insiders—founders, early investors, and team members. That concentration of token ownership still casts a long shadow over its decentralization claims.

“Solana’s crowdsale went 98.5% to insiders,” Hummer wrote. “They control a massive amount of the SOL supply—it’s basically a web2 startup, in contrast to ETH’s role as neutral digital infrastructure.”

Ethereum stood its ground when the U.S. government came after Tornado Cash. Despite sanctions and arrests, the privacy tool stayed up and running, thanks to Ethereum’s deeply decentralized design. “That’s what censorship resistance looks like,” Hummer pointed out.

The Solana episode, on the other hand, has reignited a familiar debate: speed vs. decentralization. Solana has always positioned itself as the fast, scalable alternative to Ethereum. But the way this emergency patch was pushed—covert, coordinated, and near-instant—makes it look less like a decentralized network and more like a startup pulling an all-nighter to fix a bug.

Now, with the postmortem out and the crypto crowd paying close attention, one thing’s clear: Solana avoided a disaster—but it may have also cracked open a deeper trust issue. The upgrade saved the chain from a major exploit, sure. But it also raised a hard question: who really controls Solana?

Also Read: Stellar Beats XRP Ledger & Solana in RWA Sector, Ethereum Still Tops



Dishita is a skilful content writer and have been growing her interest in crypto lately. She likes to write in other areas as well. She loves travelling & have pretty decent photography skills. She is a Baker and wants to open her Bakery. She love dogs and wish to pet them someday.
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *