WhiteBIT (WBT) Beats Pi Network (PI) by Market Cap on CoinGecko

On Friday, crypto lovers were surprised to discover a little-known token, “WhiteBIT Coin (WBT)” of a European crypto exchange, overtaking Pi Network’s $Pi token in rankings on the popular crypto aggregator website CoinGecko. But it gets interesting from here. Another popular aggregator website CoinMarketCap still displays WBIT stuck miles behind Pi.

Here’s the situation.

On CoinGecko, WBT is priced at $29.20 with a 24-hour gain of 0.6%. Its market cap is listed at around $4.2 billion, placing it at rank 32. WhiteBIT is the largest cryptocurrency exchange in Europe by trading volume.

Pi Network, meanwhile, is slightly behind at rank 33, trading at $0.594 after a 2.7% dip today.

Over the past week, Pi’s also been sliding — down 9% overall. Even though Pi’s daily trading volume is way higher ($74.9 million vs. WBT’s $19.3 million), it’s slipped just enough to let WBT inch past in terms of market cap — at least, according to CoinGecko.

CoinMarketCap doesn’t agree with any of that. Over there, Pi is sitting pretty at rank 27 with a $4.16 billion market cap. And WBT? It’s all the way down at #3168, with a market cap of just $2.52 billion. That’s a huge gap — nearly $1.7 billion difference from what CoinGecko claims.

Even the numbers around volume and daily change don’t line up. CMC shows WBT’s 24-hour volume at $22.94 million (up 36.6%), while Pi’s volume is down to $62.72 million after a 50% drop.

So what’s going on between CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap?

Honestly, this kind of mismatch isn’t new. CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap pull data differently, and their methods of calculating circulating supply, especially for tokens controlled by exchanges, can vary a lot. WBT is backed by the WhiteBIT exchange, and there’s often limited clarity on how much of its supply is actually circulating in the open market.

Pi Network, on the other hand, is still caught in its own grey area. It’s trading on some exchanges, but the project’s official launch is still pending, so many argue its market cap isn’t fully accurate either.

Either way, it’s a reminder that in crypto, rankings aren’t always as solid as they seem. Two platforms, same tokens, completely different stories. So before celebrating any market cap victory, it’s probably worth double-checking who’s doing the counting — and how.