Key Highlights
- Jesse Pollak faced backlash for supporting a Soulja Boy-linked meme token.
- ZachXBT highlighted that Soulja Boy has a history of failed crypto projects and alleged scams.
- The controversy sparked debate on leadership influence, responsibility, and trust in Base’s platform.
Jesse Pollak, co-founder of Base, is facing criticism from the crypto community after supporting a meme token linked to rapper Soulja Boy. In a recent X post, Pollak shared content highlighting Base’s creator payout feature and seemed to promote a newly issued token on the network.
Several community members questioned why a senior leader of a Coinbase-backed blockchain would highlight a celebrity with a history of controversial crypto activity. The U.S.-based rapper and public figure Soulja Boy has been involved with many meme coin launches, which all have essentially crashed to zero in value after initial hype.
Pollak replied to Soulja Boy’s posts, stating he had “just backed Soulja Boy on Base and instantly earned,” describing the interaction as “new internet” behavior. Even though he did not mention a token by name, many saw it as support for Soulja Boy’s crypto projects. Critics said this could hurt trust in Base, which positions itself as a serious and reliable platform for blockchain projects.
ZachXBT questions why Soulja Boy gets a platform
In the replies to the X post, blockchain researcher ZachXBT questioned why Soulja Boy was being given visibility at all. He reminded the community of Soulja Boy’s past in crypto, pointing to his own April 2023 research, which showed that the rapper had promoted 73 crypto projects and launched 16 NFT collections, of which many of these projects allegedly collapsed or were flagged as scams.
The researcher asked, “Why give SouljaBoy the platform to scam new people?” with old screenshots and posts, showing that Soulja Boy’s risky track record has been public knowledge for years.
Backlash sparks online debate
Many in the community said the problem was not about rules or legality but about responsibility. They argued that when a co-founder promotes a token, it carries weight, as new users often see it as an endorsement.
Others noted that Pollak had previously launched his own creator coin, which made some question whether he applies different standards to different people. Some also highlighted that Base still earns fees from activity, even if a project fails.
Those who support Pollak said Base is a permissionless platform, meaning it is neutral and open to everyone, insisting that the tools do not favor any user. Nevertheless, critics maintained that promoting a token linked to a celebrity with a history of questionable projects could hurt Base’s reputation and trust in the network.
As of now, Pollak has not publicly responded to the criticism. The discussion continues online, showing that even in a permissionless system, the actions of influential people can quickly affect trust.
Also Read: North Korean Hackers Exploit Fake Zoom to Steal Crypto
