SSV is NOT compromised: SSV Labs CEO

The SSV team said the slashings were due to external key management issues, not due to failure of its protocol.

Written By:
Jalpa Bhavsar

Reviewed By:
Divya Mistry

Ssv Is Not Compromised Ssv Labs Ceo

SSV Labs CEO Alon Muroch has moved quickly to calm concerns in the staking community after several Ethereum validators on the SSV Network were hit with slashing penalties this week.

The incidents, which involved validators run by Ankr and a seven-operator cluster that migrated from Allnodes, sparked fears about the protocol’s security.

However, in a recent post on X, Muroch made it clear that “SSV is NOT compromised.” He also stressed that operators and stakers should remain unaffected, with no action needed.

What Happened?

The SSV team revealed in the detailed post-mortem that the first slashing was flagged at 11:51 UTC on Wednesday. About 90 minutes later, a larger wave hit a cluster of 39 validators. Initial investigations suggested potential risks to the SSV Network, not by any failure of the protocol. Muroc added, “We looked at logs from both incidents and found NOTHING that indicates double signing or failure on SSV side.”

Instead, both cases were linked to validator key management issues outside SSV. In short, the technology worked as intended. The mistakes came from how the keys were handled.

Ankr Takes Responsibility

The bigger event was traced back to staking provider Ankr. The firm admitted that an operational misconfiguration during maintenance accidentally left validator keys active on two infrastructures at once, triggering the slashing. Ankr immediately shut down the affected nodes and worked with SSV Labs to verify the cause.

The smaller incident, tied to a validator cluster migrated from Allnodes, is still under review. Early signs suggest a secondary setup may have contributed.

Why Does It Matter?

SSV Network is built on distributed validator technology, splitting keys into multiple shares run by independent operators. This design helps prevent downtime and double-signing, but only if keys remain managed entirely within SSV.

“By design, SSV reduces slashing risk by distributing responsibilities across operators. However, if validator keys are run outside SSV, the guarantees no longer apply,” the team explained.

SSV Labs pointed out that the event emphasizes prudent validator key management, stored in a single secure environment with protection against slashing. The team further noted that despite penalizing some of the validators, the protocol and infrastructure overall are unaffected.

Also Read: Strategy Escapes Another Shareholder Lawsuit Over Accounting Issues


Mobile Only Image

Share This Article
Follow:
Jalpa Bhavsar is a Crypto Journalist with 3 years of experience in crypto, blockchain, AI, digital design, and crypto news reporting. She holds a B.Tech in Computer Science, bringing a strong technical foundation to her writing. Jalpa focuses on delivering clear, accurate, and engaging coverage of the latest trends and developments in the crypto and tech space.
Follow:
Divya Mistry is a Content Editor with over 9 years of experience in news, PR, marketing, and research. Armed with a Master’s Degree in English Literature from the University of Mumbai, she specializes in crafting and refining long-form content across digital and print platforms. Over the years, Divya has contributed to and shaped content for leading brands across a range of industries, including real estate, healthcare, vertical transport, entertainment, lifestyle, education, EdTech, tech, and finance. Her research work has been featured on platforms like DNA India, Forbes, and Elevator World India. She now brings her editorial and research skills to explore the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrency.