A collective of authors and publishers in France have sued social media giant Meta over training of its artificial intelligence (AI) models using the original content of artists without seeking their consent with due compensation.
Vincent Montagne, president and CEO of French publishers association stated in a joint statement, that they have observed numerous work from it’s members turning up in Meta’s data pool.
Publishers along with organizations representing authors filed a lawsuit against U.S. tech titan Meta at the Paris court. A legal complaint states Meta improperly utilized copyrighted French author and publisher content to operate its artificial intelligence systems, Meta also owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
The Paris court received the lawsuit which began when the National Publishing Union (SNE) together with the National Union of Authors and Composers (SNAC) and the Society of Men of Letters (SGDL) accused Meta of violating intellectual property rights and performing “economic parasitism.” The copyright content exploited without authorization by Meta has negatively impacted the financial position of these groups.
The general delegate of SNAC Maia Bensimon labeled this incident a “monumental looting” of intellectual property rights. Renaud Lefebvre from SNE stressed during his comments that this legal action entails both member protection and establishment of future legal standards.
OpenAI is also facing lawsuit issues in India, Canada, and the USA for training its highly demanding tool ChatGPT by using copyrighted content.
As AI technology keeps evolving every day, it is imperative for giants like Meta to draw a line to avoid copyright infringement by AI. The lawsuit presents significant consequences that will impact future AI development practices specifically concerning training utilizations of copyrighted materials. As digital environments mature the plaintiffs advocate for improved safeguards which protect creative intellectual property for its creators.
Also Read: AI Search Engines Are Usually Wrong: Columbia Journalism Review
